source-linked
GitHub MCP
Canonical source should be verified before feature-level publication.
Source ↗Legacy routes are retained, while publication status follows canonical-source verification. Each entry below is labeled with its actual review state rather than assumed to be current.
source-linked means a first-party or canonical repository is identified, but the server's current capabilities have not been independently re-verified against that source. refreshing means the route is preserved for continuity while a canonical upstream is actively being re-confirmed — treat the linked source as a starting point, not a settled fact.
source-linked
Canonical source should be verified before feature-level publication.
Source ↗refreshing
Legacy route preserved; current maintained upstream needs verification.
Source ↗refreshing
Legacy route preserved; current maintained upstream needs verification.
Source ↗source-linked
Reference-server lineage; verify current package/source before deployment.
Source ↗source-linked
First-party repository link retained; capabilities should be read from upstream.
Source ↗refreshing
Legacy URL retained while a canonical upstream is verified.
Source ↗refreshing
Legacy URL retained while an official MCP source is verified.
Source ↗source-linked
Reference-server lineage; verify current package/source before deployment.
Source ↗source-linked
Reference-server lineage; verify current package/source before deployment.
Source ↗source-linked
Reference-server lineage; verify current package/source before deployment.
Source ↗source-linked
Reference-server lineage; verify current package/source before deployment.
Source ↗source-linked
Reference-server lineage for a knowledge-graph-backed persistent memory server.
Source ↗source-linked
Reference-server lineage; verify current package/source before deployment.
Source ↗source-linked
Reference-server lineage for error-tracking data access.
Source ↗source-linked
First-party repository link retained; capabilities should be read from upstream.
Source ↗source-linked
Reference-server lineage; verify current package/source before deployment.
Source ↗source-linked
Reference-server lineage for web content fetching and conversion.
Source ↗source-linked
Reference-server lineage for timezone conversion utilities.
Source ↗refreshing
Legacy route preserved; current maintained upstream needs verification.
Source ↗source-linked
Reference-server lineage for Bedrock knowledge base retrieval.
Source ↗refreshing
Legacy route preserved; current maintained upstream needs verification.
Source ↗source-linked
Reference-server lineage for Linear issue tracking.
Source ↗source-linked
First-party repository link retained; capabilities should be read from upstream.
Source ↗source-linked
First-party Microsoft repository link retained; capabilities should be read from upstream.
Source ↗source-linked
First-party repository link retained; capabilities should be read from upstream.
Source ↗source-linked
First-party HashiCorp repository link retained; capabilities should be read from upstream.
Source ↗refreshing
Legacy route preserved; current maintained upstream needs verification.
Source ↗refreshing
Legacy route preserved; current maintained upstream needs verification.
Source ↗refreshing
Legacy route preserved; current maintained upstream needs verification.
Source ↗source-linked
Reference-server lineage used as a comprehensive test and demo server.
Source ↗source-linked
Reference-server lineage for structured, step-by-step reasoning support.
Source ↗source-linked
First-party repository link retained; capabilities should be read from upstream.
Source ↗source-linked
First-party repository link retained; capabilities should be read from upstream.
Source ↗source-linked
First-party repository link retained; capabilities should be read from upstream.
Source ↗source-linked
Community-maintained repository link retained; capabilities should be read from upstream.
Source ↗source-linked
First-party documentation link retained; capabilities should be read from upstream.
Source ↗source-linked
First-party documentation link retained; capabilities should be read from upstream.
Source ↗source-linked
First-party repository link retained; capabilities should be read from upstream.
Source ↗source-linked
First-party repository link retained; capabilities should be read from upstream.
Source ↗source-linked
First-party repository link retained; capabilities should be read from upstream.
Source ↗source-linked
First-party repository link retained; capabilities should be read from upstream.
Source ↗source-linked
First-party repository link retained; capabilities should be read from upstream.
Source ↗source-linked
First-party repository link retained; capabilities should be read from upstream.
Source ↗source-linked
First-party repository link retained; capabilities should be read from upstream.
Source ↗source-linked
First-party documentation link retained; capabilities should be read from upstream.
Source ↗source-linked
First-party repository link retained; capabilities should be read from upstream.
Source ↗source-linked
First-party repository link retained; capabilities should be read from upstream.
Source ↗source-linked
First-party repository link retained; capabilities should be read from upstream.
Source ↗refreshing
Legacy route preserved; current maintained upstream needs verification.
Source ↗source-linked
Community-maintained repository link retained; capabilities should be read from upstream.
Source ↗source-linked
First-party repository link retained; capabilities should be read from upstream.
Source ↗source-linked
First-party repository link retained; capabilities should be read from upstream.
Source ↗source-linked
First-party repository link retained; capabilities should be read from upstream.
Source ↗source-linked
Community-maintained repository link retained; capabilities should be read from upstream.
Source ↗The wider MCP hub is organized around five clusters. Each links back to source-linked entities rather than independent editorial claims about capability or performance.
| Core protocol | Clients, servers, tools, resources, prompts, transports and authorization. |
|---|---|
| Server directory | Source-linked MCP implementations with canonical upstreams. |
| Agent frameworks | How frameworks expose or consume MCP without treating MCP as a framework replacement. |
| Local LLMs | MCP with local inference, with performance claims held until reproducible benchmarks exist. |
| India | Sovereignty, Indic-language workflows and DPDP-aware architecture without automatic compliance claims. |
For discovery across a broader catalog of MCP servers beyond this evidence-graph context, see MCPServer.in, a companion directory dedicated specifically to MCP server listings.