Skip to content

MCP servers

Legacy routes are retained, while publication status follows canonical-source verification. Each entry below is labeled with its actual review state rather than assumed to be current.

How to read the status labels

source-linked means a first-party or canonical repository is identified, but the server's current capabilities have not been independently re-verified against that source. refreshing means the route is preserved for continuity while a canonical upstream is actively being re-confirmed — treat the linked source as a starting point, not a settled fact.

source-linked

GitHub MCP

Canonical source should be verified before feature-level publication.

Source ↗

refreshing

Slack MCP

Legacy route preserved; current maintained upstream needs verification.

Source ↗

source-linked

Notion MCP

First-party repository link retained; capabilities should be read from upstream.

Source ↗

source-linked

Memory MCP

Reference-server lineage for a knowledge-graph-backed persistent memory server.

Source ↗

source-linked

GitLab MCP

Reference-server lineage; verify current package/source before deployment.

Source ↗

source-linked

SQLite MCP

Reference-server lineage; verify current package/source before deployment.

Source ↗

source-linked

Fetch MCP

Reference-server lineage for web content fetching and conversion.

Source ↗

source-linked

Time MCP

Reference-server lineage for timezone conversion utilities.

Source ↗

refreshing

Redis MCP

Legacy route preserved; current maintained upstream needs verification.

Source ↗

source-linked

Context7 MCP

First-party repository link retained; capabilities should be read from upstream.

Source ↗

source-linked

Playwright MCP

First-party Microsoft repository link retained; capabilities should be read from upstream.

Source ↗

source-linked

Docker MCP

First-party repository link retained; capabilities should be read from upstream.

Source ↗

source-linked

Terraform MCP

First-party HashiCorp repository link retained; capabilities should be read from upstream.

Source ↗

refreshing

Asana MCP

Legacy route preserved; current maintained upstream needs verification.

Source ↗

source-linked

Pinecone MCP

First-party repository link retained; capabilities should be read from upstream.

Source ↗

source-linked

Stripe MCP

First-party repository link retained; capabilities should be read from upstream.

Source ↗

source-linked

Neon MCP

First-party repository link retained; capabilities should be read from upstream.

Source ↗

source-linked

Supabase MCP

Community-maintained repository link retained; capabilities should be read from upstream.

Source ↗

source-linked

Vercel MCP

First-party documentation link retained; capabilities should be read from upstream.

Source ↗

source-linked

HubSpot MCP

First-party documentation link retained; capabilities should be read from upstream.

Source ↗

source-linked

Grafana MCP

First-party repository link retained; capabilities should be read from upstream.

Source ↗

source-linked

Firecrawl MCP

First-party repository link retained; capabilities should be read from upstream.

Source ↗

source-linked

Apify MCP

First-party repository link retained; capabilities should be read from upstream.

Source ↗

source-linked

Chroma MCP

First-party repository link retained; capabilities should be read from upstream.

Source ↗

source-linked

Heroku MCP

First-party repository link retained; capabilities should be read from upstream.

Source ↗

source-linked

Atlassian MCP

First-party documentation link retained; capabilities should be read from upstream.

Source ↗

source-linked

Snowflake MCP

First-party repository link retained; capabilities should be read from upstream.

Source ↗

source-linked

BigQuery MCP

First-party repository link retained; capabilities should be read from upstream.

Source ↗

source-linked

Datadog MCP

First-party repository link retained; capabilities should be read from upstream.

Source ↗

source-linked

PagerDuty MCP

First-party repository link retained; capabilities should be read from upstream.

Source ↗

source-linked

Kagi MCP

First-party repository link retained; capabilities should be read from upstream.

Source ↗

source-linked

DuckDuckGo MCP

Community-maintained repository link retained; capabilities should be read from upstream.

Source ↗

MCP topic clusters

The wider MCP hub is organized around five clusters. Each links back to source-linked entities rather than independent editorial claims about capability or performance.

Core protocolClients, servers, tools, resources, prompts, transports and authorization.
Server directorySource-linked MCP implementations with canonical upstreams.
Agent frameworksHow frameworks expose or consume MCP without treating MCP as a framework replacement.
Local LLMsMCP with local inference, with performance claims held until reproducible benchmarks exist.
IndiaSovereignty, Indic-language workflows and DPDP-aware architecture without automatic compliance claims.

A wider MCP server registry

For discovery across a broader catalog of MCP servers beyond this evidence-graph context, see MCPServer.in, a companion directory dedicated specifically to MCP server listings.

Related pages